Archive for July, 2009
The Top 10 Most Expensive Military Planes
Posted by admin in Business-Finance on July 24th, 2009
Here is top 10 most expensive militay planes.
F/A-18 Hornet: $94 million

First entering service in the 1980s, the twin-engine fighter plane was the U.S.’s first strike fighter — an aircraft capable of attacking both ground and aerial targets. It has seen action in Operation Desert Storm and as the aircraft of the Navy’s Blue Angels Flight Demonstration Squadron. The F/A-18 is also used by Canada, Australia, Finland, Kuwait, Malaysia, Spain and Switzerland.
EA-18G Growler: $102 million
Hot off the presses, the Growler is a lightly armed version of the F/A-18 fighter that has been updated for electronic warfare (it is currently being delivered to the Navy). Growlers are capable of not only finding and disrupting anti-aircraft radar, but also jamming enemy communications.
V-22 Osprey: $118 million
This tiltrotor aircraft, which takes off and lands like a helicopter but can fly faster and farther like a fixed-wing plane, was first used in combat in Iraq in 2007. The Osprey’s production has been bedeviled by design and construction problems: the craft claimed the lives of at least 30 Marines and civilians during its development alone (former Vice President Dick Cheney tried repeatedly to ground the plane). Still, because of its range and versatility, the Marine Corps plans to deploy a squadron of V-22s to Afghanistan by the end of the year.
F-35 Lightning II: $122 million
Lockheed Martin’s 2001 deal to build these stealth, supersonic fighter jets was at the time the largest military contract ever. The F-35s, intended to replace an aging aircraft arsenal, were developed as part of a Joint Strike Fighter program between the U.S. and its allies and were criticized as underpowered and overweight — and therefore easy targets. Making matters worse, from 2007 to 2008, cyberspies infiltrated the 7.5 million lines of computer code that powered the Joint Strike Fighter, raising concerns that enemies could copy the F-35’s design and exploit its weaknesses. In April 2009, Lockheed Martin said it did not believe the program had been compromised.
E-2D Advanced Hawkeye: $232 million
A major step forward for surveillance and reconnaissance, the Advanced Hawkeye’s powerful new radar system will increase the range of territory an aircraft can monitor by 300%. “It can probably watch the pistachios pop in Iran,” an analyst for the think tank Lexington Institute told National Defense in July. Though development of the plane is on track and two test versions have been delivered to the Navy, budget cuts may keep the planes grounded for at least a year longer than planned.
VH-71 Kestrel: $241 million
This high-tech helicopter project, intended to replace the President’s aging chopper fleet, was running more than 50% over budget by the time Barack Obama took office. Soon after his Inauguration, the President announced plans to scrap the helicopters because of cost overruns. On July 22, however, the House Appropriations Committee unanimously approved restoring $485 million to fund the Kestrels.
P-8A Poseidon: $290 million
Boeing’s spruced-up military version of its 737 jet will be used by the Navy to conduct anti-submarine warfare and gather intelligence. It can carry torpedoes, missiles, depth charges and other weapons. The P-8A is expected to go into service in 2013.
C17A Globemaster III: $328 million
The Air Force military-transport plane is used to move troops into war zones, perform medical evacuations and conduct airdrop missions. There are 190 C17As in service; the aircraft is propelled by four turbofan engines (of the same type used on the twin-engine Boeing 757) and can drop 102 paratroopers at once. In operation since 1993, it has been used to deliver troops and humanitarian aid to Afghanistan and Iraq.
F-22 Raptor: $350 million
First conceived during the Cold War as an airframe to vie with Soviet aircraft that was never built, the F-22 is touted by manufacturer Lockheed Martin as the best overall combat plane in the world — not to mention the most expensive. It can shoot down enemy cruise missiles, fly long distances at supersonic speeds and avoid nearly all types of radar detection. But the Senate debate over whether to build seven more — at a taxpayer cost of $1.67 billion — eventually came down to the plane’s job-creating abilities. The axed project would have employed 25,000 Americans.
B-2 Spirit: $2.4 billion

The B-2 bomber was so costly that Congress cut its initial 1987 purchase order from 132 to 21. (A 2008 crash leaves the current number at 20.) The B-2 is hard to detect via infrared, acoustic, electromagnetic, visual or radar signals. This stealth capability makes it able to attack enemy targets with less fear of retaliation. In use since 1993, the B-2 has been deployed to both Iraq and Afghanistan.
FM 2009: Wonderkids List
Posted by admin in Entertainment on July 19th, 2009
Fm 2009 wonderkids list;
Name: Marquinhos
Position: AM RLC ST
Club: Vitoria
Nationality: Brazilian
Age: 18
Value: 3.3million
Name: Keirrison
Position: Striker
Club: Coritiba
Nationality: Brazilian
Age: 19
Value: 2.3million
Name: Victor Moses
DOB:12.12.90
Club: Cystal Palace
Value: 1m
Nationality: English
Work Permit:no
Football Manager 2009 Wonderkids Shortlist
Posted by admin in Entertainment on July 17th, 2009
Fm 2009 Wonderkids shortlist.
Personally, i don’t like to use that shortlists. But if you’re bored for sometime you may try to download this shortlist as it contains many wonderkids on fm 2009. Comment here if you have any questions.
Download Football Manager 2009 Wonderkids Shortlist: MEGAUPLOAD – The leading online storage and file delivery service
Eating Less Prolongs Life?
A leading research on calorie-restricted diet found a 30 percent reduction in daily calorie intake may improve longevity and overall wellness – at least in primates. Researcher Ricki Colman claimed monkeys under calorie-restricted diet showed decreased age-related diseases incidence and showed fewer natural deaths compared to monkeys fed regularly.
Dr. Colman followed 76 adult rhesus monkeys (a primate species closely related to humans) for 20 years dividing the monkeys into two groups: one fed regularly and the other fed with calorie-restricted diet. The calorie restricted diet composition is 15 percent protein, 10 percent fat, and loads of vitamins. The non-restricted diet subjected monkeys on the other hand can eat all they want.
Only 13 percent of the monkeys under the calorie-restricted diet died within 20 years showing a big difference from the 37 percent from the other group. The Wisconsin National Primate Research Center based researcher, however, said “We don’t know about ultimate longevity yet, but the monkeys in the calorie-restricted group are unencumbered by age-related diseases and brain atrophy, which is linked to cognitive ability.” It’s worth noting also that the oldest monkey in the group is now 29 years old when in captivity these primates live for 27 years on average only.
Although the objects of the research are monkeys, the species used genetically resembled humans very closely. The findings does not surprise calorie-restricted diet advocate Brian M. Delaney who practiced the diet since 1992. He has been eating 20 percent fewer calories compared to people with the same size and stature as he. The membership to his Calorie Restriction Society has been growing ever since.
Mr. Delaney’s diet consists of a hearty breakfast of a bowl of low-fat granola, soy milk, nonfat yogurt, fruit, and a cup of coffee. He then works like everyone else logging eight to nine hours a day while skipping his lunch. His dinner will then consist of high-fiber vegetarian diet. In a single day, Brian Delaney consumes less than 2,000 calories while most people of his body type consume an average of 2,618 calories a day.
With this news about calorie restriction, registered Dietician, Keri Gans, expressed her concern about the potential short-term and long-term effects of the diet, however. Restricting your calorie consumption can result to dizziness and exhaustion in immediate terms, and prolong restriction can result to malnutrition and more serious illness like osteoporosis and infertility. “The less calories you consume, the harder it may be to ensure that your diet includes foods that provide proper nutrition,” Gans says.
If you don’t want to starve yourself or run the risk of malnutrition, however, a study by Dr. David Sinclair found out that taking resveratrol, a natural plant chemical, can mimic the effects of calorie restriction. Taking supplementary amounts of resveratrol activates Sirt1, which is responsible for prolonging life in mammals including humans. Resveratrol is also known to aide in the fight against cancer and aging, and is being advocated by one famous heart surgeon, Dr. Mehmet Oz.
In conclusion, nutritionist strongly suggests consulting a professional dietician before you undergo any forms of diet for whatever purpose. And if you think calorie-restricted diet is not for you, maybe the research on resveratrol may provide solutions in the future.
Why are Environmentalists raising their Discontent on the Internet?
It’s now a fact: every second you spend reading this article produce about 20 milligrams of carbon dioxide environmentalists frown upon. Don’t underplay the seemingly minute green house gas you produced upon you finish reading this article, think about how many of you are surfing the Web at this moment – the resulting amount is enough for Greenpeace to clench.
How could you be producing carbon dioxide when you are snuggled in your bed while pounding your laptop’s keyboard? You are breathing right? . . . no seriously, your computer is consuming energy produced from burning coal, which is among the top green house gas producer in the world. If not the power plant in your area, maybe the website you are visiting’s facility is using energy produced from burning fossil fuel. It’s a great possibility.
For a website to be available to you, it uses massive buildings, supercomputers, servers, or what have you to store and make available the data you need. Where do you think your wedding photos you uploaded on Facebook are stored? These website facilities gobble up tremendous amount of dirty energy – although not all maybe – to run. And retrieving big pockets of data such as music or video from the Web is using more energy than say pulling up a Craigslist.org Web page.
Google’s Erik Teetzel told CNN that they estimated a 0.2 grams of carbon dioxide is produced every time you use their search engine. This energy is dedicated to receive your search query and send back the result to you. And if you add up all the emissions produced by all Google users every second, the numbers certainly pile up. In fact, some experts believe that the Internet will contribute 20 percent of the world’s greenhouse gas in about a decade – certainly not sustainable decried environmentalists.
The Climate Group and Global e-Sustainability Initiative (GeSI) estimated that 76 million tons of carbon dioxide emission in 2002 can be attributed Internet use. And the number could more than triple in the coming decade.
Websites and companies involved, however, are taking heed of the call for a green Internet. Google announced their efforts to make their six 5megawatt server farms and small data centers around the world are in place. They’re turning to energy efficient software as well as recycling water to save on energy. Yahoo, too, are claiming to have installed similar measures.
Cleanbits in Netherlands are pushing for websites to use hosting providers that uses renewable source of energy such as the California-based AISO.net. It’s these small efforts that can slowly transform Internet’s impact to global climate change. Not to mention that the Web itself is a good source of information regarding climate change.
There is no question whether the Internet is here to stay or not. For now, however, knowing that Internet use can contribute to carbon emission is enough to start the shift. And the efforts made by the pillars in the Internet business are good evidence that they are taking the right path to clean up the Web.
